How is kurtz evil

Thus, He shows his sense of ownership of things by repeatedly saying in the following way:. At this point Marlow feels that if Mr. Kurtz owns everything around hi, he himself is owned by the power of darkness. In other words Mr. Kurtz who has taken a high seat among the devils of the land, seems to Marlow to be a man who has become wholly evil.

Thus he has become an embodiment of evil. In this early life Mr. Kurtz had been a man of sound view and an enlightened outlook upon life. On one occasion he had written a pamphlet in which he had argued that the white man had a great responsibility towards the savages who recognized his superior abilities and gifts.

Having lived among them, Mr. Kurtz he has been satisfying all the primitive appeties and their gratification include all kinds of sex perversions as collective sex orgies, gang rape, homosexually, sadist and masochistic practices and so on.

However before dying Mr. Kurtz had pronounced a judgment upon the adventures which his soul had gone through on this earth. The judgment was. The horror! Where the two differ, though, is in their behavior after the murders have been committed.

In MacBeth, an almost apologetic behavior is seen. His guilt, through the hallucinations, proves that he, at least subconsciously, is sorry for what he has done. In Kurtz, no sympathy or guilt is seen. The temptation of the grove, the dark side of human nature, has a strong power over Kurtz, so much so that he prefers to remain in the primitive and savage Africa.

He would prefer to be free of society and legal boundary. In this short story, there are frequent significant subject and ideas that make the story, "A Heart of Darkness," by Joseph Conrad, and haunting novel.

The main theme is absolute white power over the natives. The theme validates the corruption, and the dependence caused by the white people as they took over the Congo. White men were giving all the power; they had no self-control, and in the end they did not use wisely. The white men became immoral. His points really lie in the peripherals of the text, as part of the vagueness and misrepresentation of reality itself.

Most noted for use of language in Heart of Darkness is Kurtz, whom Marlow regards as remarkable purely for his ability to speak eloquently. Yet when one consciously examines what Kurtz actually says in the novel, it becomes apparent that although his words sound artistic and profound, they are in reality incredibly ambiguous and devoid of meaning. The Skeptics require us to show them that they have to accept something as they will never claim so do to their own beliefs on their own and there claims cannot be defeated without such a thing.

What Kurtz shows us is that progress isn't good. In fact, it's horrific. In the nineteenth century, there was a general idea in Europe that history and cultures were evolving toward a better future. Western civilization was the pinnacle of human evolution, and eventually it was going to crowd out the darkness in other parts of the world.

Conrad didn't think so, but his objection wasn't the cultural relativism that makes us roll our eyes at that idea today. Today, we tend to see all cultures as valuable—different, sure, but equally worthwhile in their own way.

Saying that Western culture is the pinnacle of human evolution and that we have a duty to educate people all over the world strikes many people as a little presumptuous and even silly. It didn't strike Conrad as silly. It struck him as terrifying. Through Kurtz, Conrad shows us that the true result of "progress" is madness and horror. Parents Home Homeschool College Resources. Study Guide. By Joseph Conrad. Previous Next. Kurtz Click the character infographic to download.

What's Up With the Ending? Tired of ads? Join today and never see them again. Get started. But all of its claims and slogans sound somewhat hollow and empty.

The veneer Mantle of the European civilization, at the surface, seems gorgeous and glamorous. Nobody succeeds in protecting oneself from being tempted by the gorgeous veil and the veneer of the European Civilization. Its outer appearance is so enticing and hoodwinking that we could not help falling in love with it. In addition, the European civilization claims more than what it is capable.

It claims to give more than what it is able to give in reality. It tends to play the game of what the famous post-colonial critic Gayatri Spivak called 'Othering'. It is artistically boastful of its innate superiority. According to Joseph Conrad the Western civilization is worrisomely fragile and anxiously breakable. Its claims and slogans are empty and dangerous hollow. Its basic context lacks a sense of profundity when Kurtz came in the face of confrontation with Congo, the symbol of Barbarism, an antithesis of civilization; Kurtz began to show his hidden barbaric self.

His unrestrained greed just increased unbelievably. His civilized self didn't moderate and subdue the sudden emergence of the barbaric self. As Kurtz's living in Congo continued he gradually changed into the most cruel and exploitative.

Had the western civilization been as strong as it was told, Kurtz should not have degenerated into the lusty, licentious, cruel and exploitative figure. Not only Kurtz, but the group of pilgrims who were on Christianization mission turned out to be exploitative figure. Their so called mission of Christianization in Congo was a mask behind which the ghost of economic exploitation dances joyously.

Kurtz's much- boasted mission to civilize the African native is a hollow white man's burden.